Shopping for a Washing Machine Again
And here we go again. Almost four years ago to the day, we purchased a washing machine, the LG WM2487HWMA front loader. Sadly, this washer won’t make it much longer.
It’s progressively been making louder and louder noises while in operation so we had a tech inspect it. The Direct Drive motor is fine, and the drum is fine, and these are the two parts with long term warranties. It’s the parts that hold the drum and motor together that’s busted. Estimate for the repair came out to roughly $800!!
So buying a new washing machine is a better answer. Disappointed at the longevity of this LG, we looked at Consumer Reports for other options. However, LG and Samsung still lead the way in CR reviews along with the least amount of repair issues. Hmmmm. We started looking at Samsung washers only to discover that these washers are deep. They are all 27 inches wide, but between 32-34 inches deep. The typical LG 4.0 cu ft washer is right under 30 inches deep. Because of its current (immovable) location, an extra four inches wouldn’t work out. Seems like LG has the market on “small” 27-in washing machines. Other brands (GE, Maytag, Whirlpool) we looked at were all 30 inches or more. Oh, and this is for front loaders with at least 4.0 cu ft of interior space.
The new LG behemoth, the WM8000HVA, with 5.1 cu ft of space was intriguing. It’s still deeper at 32 3/10 inches compared to 29 3/4 inches, and also it’s 29 inches wide compared to the standard 27 inches. We could actually accommodate the extra two inches of width, but those few inches of depth are still a problem so we couldn’t match our other behemoth LG appliance.
So where does this leave us? Here’s a rundown of what we wanted:
- Low maintenance
- Extended warranty
- 4.0 cu ft or more of interior space
- Front loader. Every sales rep and tech still recommended front loaders for cleaner clothes.
- Similar depth of current washer
- No extra fancy wash cycles (but they all pretty much have them like it or not)
- Available NOW. Our current washer just ain’t going to make it so we can’t wait 30-60 days for delivery.

After checking out Sears, Costco, Lowes, and Home Depot, we ended up at Pacific Sales inside of Best Buy. Not finding a Samsung that met our requirements, we went with another LG, the WM4070HWA, with its 4.3 cu ft of space. It’s the same footprint of our current LG, and there is was one in stock. It seems this model is relatively new with very few reviews available unlike the popular LG WM3470. So although Pacific Sales did not have a floor model to see (neither did other stores), we bought the LG WM4070HWAD with delivery this week.
We also purchased the extended warranty due to our bad luck with our former LG washer. At $129 for 5 years (I have to check on that), it’s a reasonable addition.
Let’s hope for better luck with this LG.
Making SharePoint Print
Never really noticed, but printing from within Microsoft SharePoint Foundation 2010 isn’t really a thing. It’s not something I’d consider doing, but I can understand the need to print. By default, there’s no print function in SharePoint, but follow this short tutorial to add a Print button to a list item. Simple enough.
Kicks Analysis 2013 #8: The Champ
It’s all wins for Adidas, and the victory for Adidas was already determined before the actual game as both Louisville and Michigan were decked out in Adidas gear.

Even with its NBA pedigree and support from Kate Upton, the Wolverines couldn’t hold off the talented and relentless Cardinal squad. Props to Louisville and their Adidas camo uniforms.
Going back to 1999, the championship kicksology looks like:
- 1999 Connecticut (Nike)
- 2000 Michigan State (Reebok Answers)
- 2001 Duke (Nike)
- 2002 Maryland (Nike Shox Stunners)
- 2003 Syracuse (Nike Shox)
- 2004 Connecticut (Nike Lebron Zoom Generation and Air Force Operates)
- 2005 North Carolina (Nike Retro Jordan X)
- 2006 Florida (Nike)
- 2007 Florida (Nike)
- 2008 Kansas (Adidas)
- 2009 North Carolina (Nike)
- 2010 Duke (Nike)
- 2011 Connecticut (Nike)
- 2012 Kentucky (Nike)
- 2013 Louisville (Adidas)
From these 15 years, the championship score is 1 for Reebok, 2 for Adidas, and 12 for Nike.
And of course, the obligatory One Shining Moment.
Khal Drogo Does the Shaka
Gotta love Jason Momoa aka Khal Drogo on The Games of Thrones flashing the shaka alongside the Kingslayer and Khaleesi.
Too bad the Dothraki didn’t adopt the shaka as a hand gesture for their tribes.
Kicks Analysis 2013 #7: The Finals
From a sneaker perspective, it is over. Adidas has done it again, beating the odds. Representing 20% of the teams in the field of 64, Adidas now represents 100% of the 2013 Finalists with both Michigan and Louisville playing for the championship.

Talk about “All in for March,” Adidas got it right with their teams all in for the championship.
Drobo 5N On Sale Today
For today (April 8, 2013), Amazon’s Gold Box Deal of the Day is the Drobo 5N storage device, discounted over $100.
While this ain’t the new 5D model, the 5N is a solid choice. It’s network ready and offers the data protection you expect from Drobo.
Downton Abbey, My Latest Craze
My latest passion and addiction has been watching Downton Abbey from PBS. Although the show’s not of my typical genre, I like it! Compared to The Game of Thrones, the world of Downtown seems so small and insulated. Yet, the interactions of the family and staff make for a compelling hour of television.
Almost done with Season 3! And who would have guessed that PBS has a Twitter hashtag for Downton Abbey?! #downtonPBS
Kicks Analysis 2013 #6: The Final Four
The same has happened in 2013. Starting with three quarters of all the teams wearing Nike, the Final Four comes down to Wichita St. and Syracuse representing Nike and Louisville and Michigan wearing Adidas.
Can Adidas and their camo-based looks prevail?



